Warning: Declaration of subscribe2_widget::addPluginSubMenu() should be compatible with mijnpress_plugin_framework::addPluginSubMenu($title, $function, $file, $capability = 10, $where = 'plugins.ph...') in /home/chinerfj/gizbeat/wp-content/plugins/subscribe2-widget/subscribe2-widget.php on line 18
Warning: Declaration of subscribe2_widget::addPluginContent($links, $file) should be compatible with mijnpress_plugin_framework::addPluginContent($filename, $links, $file, $config_url = NULL) in /home/chinerfj/gizbeat/wp-content/plugins/subscribe2-widget/subscribe2-widget.php on line 18 MT6588 vs MT6592 vs MT6582 – Similarities and Differences – GizBeat
Way back in 2012 the SoC name for what is now MT6589 was to be MT6588. MediaTek did a switcharoo and MT6589 is what we ended up with. Now in 2014, MTK has taken the MT6588 name off the shelf and applied it to their just released SoC – The 4-core MTK6588.
The MT6588 has been on the charts as long as MT6592, but it wasn’t until just now that phones are beginning to show up with this SoC. Whether it was because MediaTek wanted to showcase their 8-core MT6592 for a bit, or simply because MT6588 just wasn’t ready yet is unknown.
Though in some ways the MT6588 is similar to MT6582, the MT6588 is actually closer kin to MT6592 — just a little brother version. GPU will be the same, standard CPU frequency will be the same and resolution support will be the same.
That’s not to say there aren’t several differences between MT6592 and MT6588. The most obvious difference is CPU which will be pared down to 4-core. The Mali-450 MP4 will be stepped down to 600MHz as opposed to 700MHz and the L2 cache will be 512KB vs. 1MB. Also, the MT6588 maximum frequency will be 1.7GHz compared to a maximum of 2.0GHz in MT6592.
There is some speculation that MT6588 may become the SoC of choice in near future budget phones, replacing the MT6582, but this remains to be seen. There has been significant battery life issues with MT6592, most notably with 1080p phones. Let’s hope the MT6588 does it a step or two better than MT6592 did. The Gionee E7 Mini is just being released and will be the first phone with MT6588, so we’ll be following this phone very closely to gain insight on MT6588 chipset performance.
Way back in 2012 the SoC name for what is now MT6589 was to be MT6588. MediaTek did a switcharoo and MT6589 is what we ended up with. Now in 2014, MTK has taken the MT6588 name off the shelf and applied it to their just released SoC –...
Way back in 2012 the SoC name for what is now MT6589 was to be MT6588. <a title="MediaTek has renamed the MTK MT6588 / MTK6588 to MTK MT6589 / MTK6589 (Quick Post)" href="http://www.gizbeat.com/855/mediatek-has-renamed-the-mtk-mt6588-mtk6588-to-mtk-mt6589-mtk6589-quick-post/">MediaTek did a switcharoo</a> and MT6589 is what we ended up with. Now in 2014, MTK has taken the MT6588 name off the shelf and applied it to their just released SoC – <span id="more-4064"></span> The 4-core MTK6588.
The MT6588 has been on the charts as long as MT6592, but it wasn't until just now that <a title="MT6588 Gionee E7 Mini Review Specifications" href="http://www.gizbeat.com/4046/mt6588-gionee-e7-mini-review/">phones are beginning to show up with this SoC</a>. Whether it was because MediaTek wanted to showcase their 8-core MT6592 for a bit, or simply because MT6588 just wasn't ready yet is unknown.
Though in some ways the MT6588 is similar to MT6582, the MT6588 is actually closer kin to MT6592 -- just a little brother version. GPU will be the same, standard CPU frequency will be the same and resolution support will be the same.<img class="aligncenter size-featured-slider-img wp-image-4065" src="http://www.gizbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/mt6572-vs-mt6592-vs-mt6582-vs-mt6588-640x403.jpg" alt="mt6572-vs-mt6592-vs-mt6582-vs-mt6588" width="640" height="403" />
That's not to say there aren't several differences between MT6592 and MT6588. The most obvious difference is CPU which will be pared down to 4-core. The Mali-450 MP4 will be stepped down to 600MHz as opposed to 700MHz and the L2 cache will be 512KB vs. 1MB. Also, the MT6588 maximum frequency will be 1.7GHz compared to a maximum of 2.0GHz in MT6592.
There is some speculation that MT6588 may become the SoC of choice in near future budget phones, replacing the MT6582, but this remains to be seen. There has been significant battery life issues with MT6592, most notably with 1080p phones. Let's hope the MT6588 does it a step or two better than MT6592 did. <a title="MT6588 Gionee E7 Mini Review" href="http://www.gizbeat.com/4046/mt6588-gionee-e7-mini-review/">The Gionee E7 Mini is just being released</a> and will be the first phone with MT6588, so we'll be following this phone very closely to gain insight on MT6588 chipset performance.
Damian Parsonshttps://plus.google.com/107879368390224447304admin@gizbeat.comAdministratorHi, I'm Damian Parsons. I've been working with Android phones since the first Droid came out. I'm fascinated by computers and technology. My first BBS were ran on an old Apple IIc and Commodore 64. I work hard to bring the latest updates to you every day - without all the boring fluff. Please subscribe to keep up on the newest China tech.
See our forum -> www.chinaphonearena.comGizBeat
Damian Parsons -April 20th, 2014 at 11:58 amnone
Comment author #11515 on MT6588 vs MT6592 vs MT6582 – Similarities and Differences by GizBeat
The issue is mostly with 1080p models that have the MT6592 SoC. They generally have significantly poorer battery life than 720p with MT6592.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorThe issue is mostly with 1080p models that have the MT6592 SoC. They generally have significantly poorer battery life than 720p with MT6592.
Damian Parsons -April 20th, 2014 at 3:54 pmnone
Comment author #11519 on MT6588 vs MT6592 vs MT6582 – Similarities and Differences by GizBeat
I wouldn’t disagree with you there. For savvy consumers this is a given, but not everyone is such. As well, some SoC are affected more than others. MT6589 generally had significantly better battery life than MT6592 — 720p or 1080p.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorI wouldn't disagree with you there. For savvy consumers this is a given, but not everyone is such. As well, some SoC are affected more than others. MT6589 generally had significantly better battery life than MT6592 -- 720p or 1080p.
Mordechai Berkun -April 21st, 2014 at 12:32 amnone
Comment author #11530 on MT6588 vs MT6592 vs MT6582 – Similarities and Differences by GizBeat
I am using the Alcatel OT Idol X+ 6043D with this soc and I find the battery life, in normal use, very much as phones with the Snappdragon 800 and higher capacity batteries.
Mordechai BerkunPublic CommentUserI am using the Alcatel OT Idol X+ 6043D with this soc and I find the battery life, in normal use, very much as phones with the Snappdragon 800 and higher capacity batteries.
Damian Parsons -April 21st, 2014 at 12:41 amnone
Comment author #11531 on MT6588 vs MT6592 vs MT6582 – Similarities and Differences by GizBeat
I’d be interested to see your GSAM results. Please post them in the forum if you have the time. Generally speaking MT6589 put MT6592 to shame regarding battery life.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorI'd be interested to see your GSAM results. Please post them in the forum if you have the time. Generally speaking MT6589 put MT6592 to shame regarding battery life.
I googled MT6592 battery life issues, found nothing, have you got a link which describe these issues?
shmoxPublic CommentUserI googled MT6592 battery life issues, found nothing, have you got a link which describe these issues?The issue is mostly with 1080p models that have the MT6592 SoC. They generally have significantly poorer battery life than 720p with MT6592.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorThe issue is mostly with 1080p models that have the MT6592 SoC. They generally have significantly poorer battery life than 720p with MT6592.Well, i think this is aplicable for all socs…
shmoxPublic CommentUserWell, i think this is aplicable for all socs...I wouldn’t disagree with you there. For savvy consumers this is a given, but not everyone is such. As well, some SoC are affected more than others. MT6589 generally had significantly better battery life than MT6592 — 720p or 1080p.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorI wouldn't disagree with you there. For savvy consumers this is a given, but not everyone is such. As well, some SoC are affected more than others. MT6589 generally had significantly better battery life than MT6592 -- 720p or 1080p.I am using the Alcatel OT Idol X+ 6043D with this soc and I find the battery life, in normal use, very much as phones with the Snappdragon 800 and higher capacity batteries.
Mordechai BerkunPublic CommentUserI am using the Alcatel OT Idol X+ 6043D with this soc and I find the battery life, in normal use, very much as phones with the Snappdragon 800 and higher capacity batteries.I’d be interested to see your GSAM results. Please post them in the forum if you have the time. Generally speaking MT6589 put MT6592 to shame regarding battery life.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorI'd be interested to see your GSAM results. Please post them in the forum if you have the time. Generally speaking MT6589 put MT6592 to shame regarding battery life.