Just 3 days ago Qualcomm released its new quad-core CPUs – the Snapdragon S4 MSM8225Q and MSM 8625Q.
It’s a bit strange that Qualcomm chose “MSM”, but choose it they did. Both of these CPUs are part of Qualcomm’s budget “Play” line of mobile CPUs.
MTK mt6588 / MTK6588 will be Cortex-A7, while Qualcomm is going with Cortex-A5. Both these decisions are based, in part, towards reducing power consumption.
That they both have chosen a less power hungry architecture, and are using 28nm process, should make strides towards giving us significantly longer battery life.
Keep in mind, many of us are relying on and using our smartphones for more and more tasks, and Android software is becoming more complex, so depending on your use, some of us may not notice a difference in battery life. But given the same usage, GizBeat would guess we’ll see at least a 20% increase.
More to come in part 2! Please subscribe to keep the Beat rollin’!
Just 3 days ago Qualcomm released its new quad-core CPUs - the Snapdragon S4 MSM8225Q and MSM 8625Q.
It's a bit strange that Qualcomm chose 'MSM', but choose it they did. Both of these CPUs are part of Qualcomm's budget 'Play' line of mobile CPUs.
MTK mt6588 / MTK6588 will be...
<a href="http://gizbeat.com/836/mtk-mt6588-mtk6588-vs-qualcomms-msm8225q-and-msm8625q-quick-post-part-1/mtk6588-vs-qualcomm-msm8625/" rel="attachment wp-att-838"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-838" title="mtk6588-vs-qualcomm-msm8625" src="http://gizbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/mtk6588-vs-qualcomm-msm8625-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="169" /></a>Just 3 days ago Qualcomm released its new quad-core CPUs - the Snapdragon S4 MSM8225Q and MSM 8625Q.<span id="more-836"></span>
It's a bit strange that Qualcomm chose "MSM", but choose it they did. Both of these CPUs are part of Qualcomm's budget "Play" line of mobile CPUs.
MTK mt6588 / MTK6588 will be Cortex-A7, while Qualcomm is going with Cortex-A5. Both these decisions are based, in part, towards reducing power consumption.
That they both have chosen a less power hungry architecture, and are using 28nm process, should make strides towards giving us significantly longer battery life.
Keep in mind, many of us are relying on and using our smartphones for more and more tasks, and Android software is becoming more complex, so depending on your use, some of us may not notice a difference in battery life. But given the same usage, GizBeat would guess we'll see at least a 20% increase.
More to come in part 2! Please subscribe to keep the Beat rollin'!
Damian Parsonshttps://plus.google.com/107879368390224447304admin@gizbeat.comAdministratorHi, I'm Damian Parsons. I've been working with Android phones since the first Droid came out. I'm fascinated by computers and technology. My first BBS were ran on an old Apple IIc and Commodore 64. I work hard to bring the latest updates to you every day - without all the boring fluff. Please subscribe to keep up on the newest China tech.
See our forum -> www.chinaphonearena.comGizBeat
ram -September 30th, 2012 at 5:52 pmnone
Comment author #230 on MTK MT6588 / MTK6589 vs Qualcomm’s MSM8225Q and MSM8625Q (Quick Post – Part 1) by GizBeat
by the way which is better one cortex a5 or a7……
ramPublic CommentUserby the way which is better one cortex a5 or a7......
Damian Parsons -October 1st, 2012 at 4:14 amnone
Comment author #232 on MTK MT6588 / MTK6589 vs Qualcomm’s MSM8225Q and MSM8625Q (Quick Post – Part 1) by GizBeat
Hello Ram, Cortex a7 is a poor man’s Cortex a15, having the exact same architecture and feature sets. Cortex a15 is Arm’s top Cortex architecture.
Cortex a7 supports Superscalar. The big tell is that per Mhz, the Cortex a7 is 20% faster than Cortex a5 (and Cortex a9 is 20% faster per Mhz than Cortex a7). Of course, this doesn’t take into account battery usage.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorHello Ram, Cortex a7 is a poor man's Cortex a15, having the exact same architecture and feature sets. Cortex a15 is Arm's top Cortex architecture.
Cortex a7 supports <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superscalar" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Superscalar</a>. The big tell is that per Mhz, the Cortex a7 is 20% faster than Cortex a5 (and Cortex a9 is 20% faster per Mhz than Cortex a7). Of course, this doesn't take into account battery usage.
Dov -August 24th, 2013 at 8:29 pmnone
Comment author #5963 on MTK MT6588 / MTK6589 vs Qualcomm’s MSM8225Q and MSM8625Q (Quick Post – Part 1) by GizBeat
So which is ultimately better?
DovPublic CommentUserSo which is ultimately better?
Damian Parsons -August 24th, 2013 at 9:40 pmnone
Comment author #5964 on MTK MT6588 / MTK6589 vs Qualcomm’s MSM8225Q and MSM8625Q (Quick Post – Part 1) by GizBeat
MTK6589
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorMTK6589
mohamed -April 9th, 2014 at 4:26 pmnone
Comment author #11123 on MTK MT6588 / MTK6589 vs Qualcomm’s MSM8225Q and MSM8625Q (Quick Post – Part 1) by GizBeat
which better and why ? Snapdragon MSM8625Q or mtk6589
mohamedPublic CommentUserwhich better and why ? Snapdragon MSM8625Q or mtk6589
by the way which is better one cortex a5 or a7……
ramPublic CommentUserby the way which is better one cortex a5 or a7......Hello Ram, Cortex a7 is a poor man’s Cortex a15, having the exact same architecture and feature sets. Cortex a15 is Arm’s top Cortex architecture.
Cortex a7 supports Superscalar. The big tell is that per Mhz, the Cortex a7 is 20% faster than Cortex a5 (and Cortex a9 is 20% faster per Mhz than Cortex a7). Of course, this doesn’t take into account battery usage.
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorHello Ram, Cortex a7 is a poor man's Cortex a15, having the exact same architecture and feature sets. Cortex a15 is Arm's top Cortex architecture. Cortex a7 supports <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superscalar" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Superscalar</a>. The big tell is that per Mhz, the Cortex a7 is 20% faster than Cortex a5 (and Cortex a9 is 20% faster per Mhz than Cortex a7). Of course, this doesn't take into account battery usage.So which is ultimately better?
DovPublic CommentUserSo which is ultimately better?MTK6589
Damian ParsonsMember of GizBeatAdministratorMTK6589which better and why ? Snapdragon MSM8625Q or mtk6589
mohamedPublic CommentUserwhich better and why ? Snapdragon MSM8625Q or mtk6589